Mirjam Bjorklund vs Ysaline Bonaventure Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bjorklund vs Bonaventure analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Ysaline Bonaventure Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bjorklund 1 - 1 Bonaventure
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bjorklund has won 63.01% of points on their second serve, while Bonaventure has won 39.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bjorklund, in recent form, has won 59.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bonaventure has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.52% and 41.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bjorklund has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bonaventure has saved 41.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bjorklund has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 7), with Bonaventure winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22). Bonaventure has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 88/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 4), where as Bonaventure has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bjorklund winning 1 times and Bonaventure being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Bjorklund winning 2 and Bonaventure winning 3. The last match between Bjorklund and Bonaventure was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bjorklund and Bonaventure have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bjorklund winning 1 times and Bonaventure 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bjorklund winning 0, and Bonaventure 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bjorklund has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.48 while Bonaventure has played against players with an average rank of 364.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bjorklund has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bonaventure has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bjorklund has converted 64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bonaventure has converted 55.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
10
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
272
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
617
Rank
81
High
29
Age
L
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
61% (215-136)
Career Total W/L
59% (385-270)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$378,603
Career Prize Money
$894,323
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bjorklund VS Bonaventure H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Ysaline Bonaventure |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 25 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 15 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:58 | 1:43:58 |
1st Serve % | 60% (97/161) | 55% (88/160) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (55/97) | 66% (58/88) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (40/64) | 56% (40/72) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 41% (7/17) |
Return Points W% | 39% (62/160) | 41% (66/161) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Bjorklund VS Bonaventure H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ysaline Bonaventure
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
76%
(
25 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
7-5 6-4 |
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Ysaline Bonaventure |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (1/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 60% (3/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 61% (37/24) | 51% (23/22) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.09 |
Aces Total | 6 | 2 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.77 |
DFs Total | 3 | 17 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:38:30 |
Avg Opp Rank | 153.8 | 251.5 |
1st Serve % | 62% (119/192) | 53% (77/145) |
1st Serve W% | 59% (70/119) | 64% (49/77) |
2nd Serve W% | 63% (46/73) | 40% (27/68) |
BPs Won% Total | 64% (16/25) | 56% (10/18) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (93/193) | 45% (65/143) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
25
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Carla Tomai
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Makenna Jones
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more